Antimicrobial catheters against secondary infection Essay
Antimicrobial catheters against secondary infection Essay
When accessing a medical facility owing to an illness, the last thing that a patient would want is to get a facility-acquired infection. An example is seen in the case of urinary catheters use where the possibility of facility-acquired urinary tract infection (UTI) is presented. In this case, it is noted that nurses can apply evidence-based infection control strategies to ensure that patient do not get such infections. Antimicrobial catheters against secondary infection Essay. Some of these strategies include disinfecting and washing hands, applying barrier precautions, wearing protective clothing, and keeping the environment clean. Nurses now understand that although the strategies applied in infection control adds to their responsibilities, it is worth the effort by avoiding preventable infections (Patterson, 2015). As a result, there is a need to present a strategy for reducing the risk of UTI when using catheters, with the focus being on presenting tangible evidence.
BUY A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE
Change Model Overview
The ACE Star Model has been considered appropriate for guiding the change project. The model is focused on understanding the different aspects of evidence-based practice, particularly the unique knowledge characteristics, nature and cycles, and how these aspects can be formalized into a logical practice format (Ellis, 2016). In the present case, the model has been conceptualized as a simplified presentation of the relationship between the use of antimicrobial catheters and reduced incidence of secondary infection as well as how this information can be used to modify nursing policies and practice. In fact, the model will be applied to review relevant primary and secondary information within the context of evidence-based practice with the intention of reducing the incidence of secondary infection when catheters are used Antimicrobial catheters against secondary infection Essay.
Evidence
Cooper et al. (2016) acknowledges that policies for managing urinary catheters have an influence in secondary infection incidence. This means that if the catheters are handled in the wrong way, then the incidence of secondary infection will rise with the reverse being equally true. Additionally, the article notes that outcomes are influenced by perception of patients’ satisfaction, quality of life, type of trauma on the urinary tract, economics, replacement method used, environment-specific performance difference at home and hospital, catheter replacement strategy, and lubrication used. As such, there is a need to present evidence that points out a standardized policy for catheter management that reduces the secondary infection incidence Antimicrobial catheters against secondary infection Essay. Based on this awareness, the proposed change anticipates that using antimicrobial catheters is a good policy that is likely to preempt the probability of secondary infection.
Translation
To collect the required evidence that would inform nursing practice, the change will first be applied on a small scale with one facility selected with only part of its population voluntarily subjected to the experimental use of antimicrobial catheters. The secondary infection incidence for the treatment group will then be compared against the infection incidence for the patients who did not use antimicrobial catheters. Any difference in infection incidence would be attributed to the antimicrobial catheters as the cause. Lower incidence of infection rate will imply that the antimicrobial catheters are effective while higher incidence of infection will imply that the antimicrobial catheters are ineffective. Once the results are collected, they will be published with recommendations on how the medical fraternity should interpret the results.
Conclusion
One must accept that the risk of secondary infection linked with catheter use is a source of concern. Additionally, one must acknowledge that the different policies for managing catheters produce different results in terms of causing secondary infection. The proposed change intends to reduce the incidence of secondary infection by using antimicrobial catheters. Should the results from the change project show that antimicrobial catheter are effective in reducing the incidence of secondary infection, then a recommendation will be made that use of microbial catheters should be considered standard practice Antimicrobial catheters against secondary infection Essay.
References
Cooper, F., Alexander, C., Sinha, S. & Omar, M. (2016). Policies for replacing long-term indwelling urinary catheters in adults. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2016(7), Art. No.: CD011115. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD011115.pub2
Ellis, P. (2016). Evidence-based Practice in Nursing (3rd ed.). London: Learning Matter/SAGE Publications Ltd.
Patterson, C. (2015). Basic principles of infection control. Nursing made Incredibly Easy, 13(3), 28-37.
