“common practice” and “best practice” difference Evidence-Based Project Assignment

“common practice” and “best practice” difference Evidence-Based Project Assignment

Matrix Worksheet Template

 

Use this document to complete Part 2 of the Module 2 Assessment, Evidence-Based Project, Part 1: An Introduction to Clinical Inquiry and Part 2: Research Methodologies

BUY PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE

 

Full citation of selected article Article #1 Article #2 Article #3 Article #4
          Bennett, G., & Mansell, I. (2004). Universal precautions: a survey of community nurses experience and           practice. Journal of Clinical Nursing13(4), 413–421. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2702.2003.00889.x           Sarsangi, V., Salehiniya, H., Hannani, M., Marzaleh, M. A., Abadi, Y. S., Honarjoo, F., … Derakhshanjazari, M.           (2017). Assessment of workload effect on nursing occupational accidents in hospitals of Kashan,           Iran. Biomedical Research and Therapy4(08), 1527. doi: 10.15419/bmrat.v4i08.226           Rodrigues, P. S., Sousa, A. F. L. D., Magro, M. C. D. S., Andrade, D. D., & Hermann, P. R. D. S. (2017). Occupational           accidents among nursing professionals working in critical units of an emergency service. Escola Anna Nery – Revista De Enfermagem21(2). doi: 10.5935/1414-8145.20170040           Santos, S., Macedo, F., Silva, L., Resck, Z., Nogueira, D. A., & Terra, F. S. (2017). Work accidents and self-esteem of nursing professional in hospital settings. Revista latino-americana de enfermagem25, e2872.           https://doi.org/10.1590/1518-8345.1632.2872
Why you chose this article and/or how it relates to the clinical issue of interest (include a brief explanation of the ethics of research related to your clinical issue of interest)  

I chose this article because it provides research regarding what precautions nurses does not take before delivering care to the patients which supports my issue of interest.

 

 

I chose this article because it provides the assessment of nursing accidents occurs due to increase workload. And this related to my issue of interest that is occupational accidents faced by nurses

 

I chose this article because it is related to my issue of interest because this research identifies the prevalence of work related accidents among nurses.

 

I chose this article because this research justifies my issue of interest by analyzing the occurrence of work related accidents of nurses. “common practice” and “best practice” difference Evidence-Based Project Assignment

Brief description of the aims of the research of each peer-reviewed article The aim of this research is to identify the nurse’s experience and their practice of using precautions.

 

 

The aim of this research was to identify the relation between workload and nursing accidents. The aim of this research was to identify the prevalence of occupational accidents among nurses working in critical units. The aim of this research was to analyze the incidence of work related accidents and the impact of self-esteem of nurses.
Brief description of the research methodology used Be sure to identify if the methodology used was qualitative, quantitative, or a mixed-methods approach. Be specific. The method used in this research was questionnaire survey.

Quantitative methodology was used and data was entered into SPSS for analysis.

 

 

 

 

 

The method used analytic-descriptive study which was mixed-method approach. The method used in the research was quantitative approach. They used descriptive-cross sectional study. Both interviews and survey questionnaires were used. The method use in this research was Quantitative approach. “common practice” and “best practice” difference Evidence-Based Project Assignment
A brief description of the strengths of each of the research methodologies used, including reliability and validity of how the methodology was applied in each of the peer-reviewed articles you selected. The strength of the research was questionnaire were validated by nurse managers and infection control nurses. However, reliability was not applied in the methodology.

 

The strength of this research methodology was the large sample size. They used the reliable and valid assessment scale to assess the mental workload with proper evidence. The strength in their method was the time scale of each interview conducted. The use of software to run their data was reliable. The strength in their method was the large sample size. They used reliable and validated Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale for their research.
General Notes/Comments The research could be better if it was not only survey based and if the study conducted in not only one health care system but others too. “common practice” and “best practice” difference Evidence-Based Project Assignment

 

 

 

 

 

The research was complete with proper defined tests, measurements and the outcome. The hefty workload among nurses during hospital hours affect their performance and leads to occupational hazards and injuries. Surveys conducted by researchers was very detailed with proper use of methodology.

Working in critical care units is very stressful for nurses. They have to be all eyes all the time that is the reason there is increased risk of occupational injuries among nurses in emergency units.

The researchers in this article provide detailed knowledge and evaluation of work accident occurs with nurses. There are lots of articles about the increase risk of injuries among nurses in hospital environment.

 

Assignment: Evidence-Based Project

Is there a difference between “common practice” and “best practice”?

When you first went to work for your current organization, experienced colleagues may have shared with you details about processes and procedures. Perhaps you even attended an orientation session to brief you on these matters. As a “rookie,” you likely kept the nature of your questions to those with answers that would best help you perform your new role.

Over time and with experience, perhaps you recognized aspects of these processes and procedures that you wanted to question further. This is the realm of clinical inquiry.

Clinical inquiry is the practice of asking questions about clinical practice. To continuously improve patient care, all nurses should consistently use clinical inquiry to question why they are doing something the way they are doing it. Do they know why it is done this way, or is it just because we have always done it this way? Is it a common practice or a best practice?

In this Assignment, you will identify clinical areas of interest and inquiry and practice searching for research in support of maintaining or changing these practices. You will also analyze this research to compare research methodologies employed. “common practice” and “best practice” difference Evidence-Based Project Assignment

To Prepare:

  • Review the Resources and identify a clinical issue of interest that can form the basis of a clinical inquiry.
  • Based on the clinical issue of interest and using keywords related to the clinical issue of interest, search at least four different databases in the Walden Library to identify at least four relevant peer-reviewed articles related to your clinical issue of interest. You should not be using systematic reviews for this assignment, select original research articles.
  • Review the results of your peer-reviewed research and reflect on the process of using an unfiltered database to search for peer-reviewed research.
  • Reflect on the types of research methodologies contained in the four relevant peer-reviewed articles you selected.

Part 1: An Introduction to Clinical Inquiry

Create a 4- to 5-slide PowerPoint presentation in which you do the following:

  • Identify and briefly describe your chosen clinical issue of interest.
  • Describe how you used keywords to search on your chosen clinical issue of interest.
  • Identify the four research databases that you used to conduct your search for the peer-reviewed articles you selected.
  • Provide APA citations of the four peer-reviewed articles you selected.

Part 2: Identifying Research Methodologies

After reading each of the four peer-reviewed articles you selected, use the Matrix Worksheet template to analyze the methodologies applied in each of the four peer-reviewed articles. Your analysis should include the following:

  • The full citation of each peer-reviewed article in APA format. “common practice” and “best practice” difference Evidence-Based Project Assignment
  • A brief (1-paragraph) statement explaining why you chose this peer-reviewed article and/or how it relates to your clinical issue of interest, including a brief explanation of the ethics of research related to your clinical issue of interest.
  • A brief (1-2 paragraph) description of the aims of the research of each peer-reviewed article.
  • A brief (1-2 paragraph) description of the research methodology used. Be sure to identify if the methodology used was qualitative, quantitative, or a mixed-methods approach. Be specific.
  • A brief (1- to 2-paragraph) description of the strengths of each of the research methodologies used, including reliability and validity of how the methodology was applied in each of the peer-reviewed articles you selected.
Excellent Good Fair Poor
Part 1: An Introduction to Clinical Inquiry

Create a 4- to 5-slide PowerPoint presentation in which you do the following:

·   Identify and briefly describe your chosen clinical issue of interest.

·   Describe how you used keywords to search on your chosen clinical issue of interest.

·   Identify the four research databases that you used to conduct your search for the peer-reviewed articles you selected.

·   Provide APA citations of the four-peer reviewed articles you selected.

36 (36%) – 40 (40%)

The presentation clearly and accurately identifies and describes in detail the chosen clinical issue of interest.

The presentation accurately and thoroughly describes in detail how keywords were used to search on the chosen clinical issue of interest.

The presentation accurately and clearly identifies in detail four or more research databases that were used to conduct a search for selected peer-reviewed articles.

The presentation accurately provides APA citations of four or more peer-reviewed articles selected.

32 (32%) – 35 (35%)

The presentation accurately identifies and describes the chosen clinical issue of interest.

The presentation accurately describes how keywords were used to search on the chosen clinical issue of interest.

The presentation accurately identifies at least four research databases that were used to conduct a search for selected peer-reviewed articles.

The presentation accurately provides APA citations of at least four peer-reviewed articles selected.

28 (28%) – 31 (31%)

The presentation inaccurately or vaguely identifies and describes the chosen clinical issue of interest. “common practice” and “best practice” difference Evidence-Based Project Assignment

The presentation inaccurately or vaguely describes how keywords were used to search on the chosen clinical issue of interest.

The presentation inaccurately or vaguely identifies at least four research databases that were used to conduct a search for selected peer-reviewed articles.

The presentation inaccurately provides APA citations of the peer-reviewed articles selected.

(0%) – 27 (27%)

The presentation inaccurately and vaguely identifies and describes the chosen clinical issue of interest or is missing.

The presentation inaccurately and vaguely describes how keywords were used to search on the chosen clinical issue of interest or is missing.

The presentation inaccurately and vaguely identifies less than four research databases that were used to conduct a search for selected peer-reviewed articles or is missing.

The presentation inaccurately provides APA citations of the peer-reviewed articles selected.

Part 2: Identifying Research Methodologies

After reading each of the four peer-reviewed articles you selected, use the Matrix Worksheet template to analyze the methodologies applied in each of the four peer-reviewed articles. Your analysis should include the following:

·  The full citation of each peer-reviewed article in APA format.

·   A brief statement explaining why you chose this peer-reviewed article and/or how it relates to your clinical issue of interest, including a brief explanation of the ethics of research related to your clinical issue of interest.

·   A brief description of the aims of the research of each peer-reviewed article.

·  A brief description of the research methodology used. Be sure to identify if the methodology used was qualitative, quantitative, or a mixed-methods approach. Be specific.

45 (45%) – 50 (50%)

The response accurately and clearly provides a full citation of each article in APA format.

The responses accurately and thoroughly explain the selection of these articles and/or how they relate to a clinical issue of interest, including a detailed explanation of the ethics of research.

The responses accurately and clearly describe the aims of the research.

The responses accurately and clearly describe the research methodology used, and clearly identify the type of methodology used with specific and relevant examples.

The responses accurately and clearly describe the strengths of each of the research methodologies used, including a detailed explanation of the reliability and validity of how the methodology was applied in each of the articles selected.

The responses provide a complete, detailed, and specific synthesis of two outside resources related to the selection of articles and two or three course-specific resources.

40 (40%) – 44 (44%)

The response accurately provides a citation of each peer-reviewed article in APA format.

The responses accurately explain the selection of these peer-reviewed articles and/or how they relate to a clinical issue of interest, including an accurate explanation of ethics.

The responses accurately describe the aims of the research of each peer-reviewed article.

The responses accurately describe the research methodology used and type of methodology used with some examples.

The responses accurately describe the strengths of each of the research methodologies used, including an explanation of the reliability and validity of how the methodology was applied in each of the peer-reviewed articles selected.

The responses provide an accurate synthesis of at least one outside resource related to the selection of the peer-reviewed articles. The response integrates at least one outside resource and two or three course-specific resources.

35 (35%) – 39 (39%)

The response inaccurately or vaguely provides a citation of each peer-reviewed article in APA format.

The responses inaccurately or vaguely explain the selection of these articles and/or how they relate to a clinical issue of interest, including the explanation of the ethics.

The responses inaccurately or vaguely describe the aims of the research of each article.

The responses inaccurately or vaguely describe the research methodology used and the type of methodology used, with only some examples.

The responses inaccurately or vaguely describe the strengths of each of the research methodologies used, including the explanation of the reliability and validity of how the methodology was applied in each of the articles selected.

The responses provided vaguely or inaccurately synthesize outside resources related to the selection of the articles. The response minimally integrates resources that may support the responses provided.

(0%) – 34 (34%)

The response inaccurately and vaguely provides a citation of each peer-reviewed article in APA format or is missing.

The responses inaccurately and vaguely explain the selection of these articles and/or how they relate to a clinical issue, including the explanation of ethics of research, or they are missing.

The responses inaccurately and vaguely describe the aims of the research, or they are missing.

The responses inaccurately and vaguely describe the research methodology used, the type of methodology used with no examples present, or they are missing.

The responses inaccurately and vaguely describe the strengths of each of the methodologies used, including the explanation of the reliability and validity of the methodology, or they are missing. “common practice” and “best practice” difference Evidence-Based Project Assignment

The responses provide a vague and inaccurate synthesis of outside resources related to the selection of the articles and fail to integrate any resources to support the responses provided, or is missing.

Written Expression and Formatting—Paragraph Development and Organization:
Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction is provided, which delineates all required criteria.
(5%) – 5 (5%)

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity.

A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion are provided, which delineates all required criteria. “common practice” and “best practice” difference Evidence-Based Project Assignment

(4%) – 4 (4%)

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time.

Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are stated but are brief and not descriptive.

3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60–79% of the time.

Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is vague or off topic.

(0%) – 3 (3%)

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity less than 60% of the time.

No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion is provided.

Written Expression and Formatting—English Writing Standards:

Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation.

(5%) – 5 (5%)
Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.
(4%) – 4 (4%)
Contains a few (one or two) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.
3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)
Contains several (three or four) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.
(0%) – 3 (3%)
Contains many (five or more) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.
Total Points: 100

An Introduction to Clinical Inquiry

Evidence-Based Project

Clinical Issue of Interest

Occupational accidents faced by Nurses in clinical practice

Describe how you used keywords to search on your chosen clinical issue of interest

First I used the keyword “Clinical issues of interest” and I couldn’t find anything related to my interest. Then I used the keyword “Nursing Clinical issues”, and there were so many topics and keywords within them to find my desired keyword of inquiry. “common practice” and “best practice” difference Evidence-Based Project Assignment

I brainstormed many research topics by opening some researches on new tab, and then I find the topic that caught my interest.

Then I used the keywords

Workplace Injuries, Nursing

After finding the desired topic for my research of interest, I started opening the topics related to workplace injuries faced by nurses.

Identify the four research databases that you used to conduct your search for the peer-reviewed articles you selected.

1.Publons

2.Pubmed

3.ResearchGate

4.SemanticScholar

Provide APA citations of the four peer-reviewed articles you selected

Bennett, G., & Mansell, I. (2004). Universal precautions: a survey of community nurses experience and   practice. Journal of Clinical Nursing13(4), 413–421. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2702.2003.00889.x

Sarsangi, V., Salehiniya, H., Hannani, M., Marzaleh, M. A., Abadi, Y. S., Honarjoo, F., … Derakhshanjazari, M.   (2017). Assessment of workload effect on nursing occupational accidents in hospitals of Kashan,   Iran. Biomedical Research and Therapy4(08), 1527. doi: 10.15419/bmrat.v4i08.226 “common practice” and “best practice” difference Evidence-Based Project Assignment

Rodrigues, P. S., Sousa, A. F. L. D., Magro, M. C. D. S., Andrade, D. D., & Hermann, P. R. D. S. (2017).   Occupational accidents among nursing professionals working in critical units of an emergency   service. Escola Anna Nery Revista De Enfermagem21(2). doi: 10.5935/1414-8145.20170040

Santos, S., Macedo, F., Silva, L., Resck, Z., Nogueira, D. A., & Terra, F. S. (2017). Work accidents and self-  esteem of nursing professional in hospital settings. Revista latino-americana de enfermagem25,   e2872. https://doi.org/10.1590/1518-8345.1632.2872 “common practice” and “best practice” difference Evidence-Based Project Assignment

 

Open chat
chat us now
Whatsapp Online Nursing Papers
We will write your work from scratch and ensure it's plagiarism-free, you just submit.